Software Development
Technical Consulting & Audits
Performance, security and architecture audits of existing systems, with a prioritized findings report and a concrete action plan.
How we run an audit
Every finding is documented with its real severity and impact.
When a system runs slow, fails intermittently, or nobody from the original team that built it is still around, the first move is not a rewrite — it is understanding what is there and what state it is in. This service is also common before a major decision — replacing a system, commissioning new development, investing in more infrastructure — when the company wants an independent technical opinion before committing budget. It is equally useful for a mid-sized company that depends on a system built years ago, with no documentation, and needs to understand its condition before investing in it further.
We carry out technical audits of applications and servers in production, with twenty years of experience reviewing code written by other teams. We cover performance (database queries, caching configuration, response times, Core Web Vitals), security (dependencies with known vulnerabilities, server configuration, session and sensitive-data handling), architecture and code quality (accumulated technical debt, coupling, what is worth refactoring and what is better left alone), and infrastructure (server sizing, backup policy, monitoring and alerts).
For example, a company evaluating whether to replace its internal management system with a new one can commission an audit first to confirm whether the real problem is the platform itself or just poorly optimized queries and missing caching — avoiding the cost of a full rebuild if the current system still has room to improve. Another frequent case is a company that lost touch with the developer or vendor who built its system and is not sure what state it is in: the audit gives them a clear map before assigning new work to an in-house team or another provider.
The deliverable is a report with findings prioritized by impact and effort to fix, plus a concrete action plan — not a list of generic observations. Implementation can stay with the company's own team or with us; the report is equally useful either way, and it also works as a second opinion before committing to a large development. Once changes are applied, we can re-verify the critical points to confirm they were resolved.